Marvel Studios has lately harbinger that they wantDeadpool 3to elevate the serial publication in the same way thatThor : Ragnarokdid . This has get film lover onRedditthinking about other examples of movies whose sequels made bighearted change both stylistically and narratively from the original ( for better or for spoilt ) .

Particularly in a clip when continuation and tailspin - offs are becoming more and more coarse , it is n’t that surprising that enfranchisement can experience some serious alteration over the course of a few movies . WhetherJurassic ParkorRocky , Reddit has gift its strongest examples of those that have vary the most .

Jurassic Park (1993)

Steven Spielberg ’s original adaptation ofJurassic Parkis often hailed as one of the most piquant and exciting category films ever made , but its subsequence woefully do n’t experience the same congratulations . Despite being revived for a newfangled generation withJurassic World , these motion picture sadly palpate completely unlike from the original .

Reddit useronwardalannotes this , writing that " not even the original radical fromJurassic Parkcould deliver [ the sequels ] … the first two were the only secure films ( with the first being a classic ) but evenThe Lost Worldfelt a lot different toJurassic Park . “To make matters worse , the latestJurassicfilm , Jurassic World : Dominion , was anything but a moving picture focusing on dinosaurs , where the franchise ’s main spectacle was only put in the desktop dish up such an peanut purpose to the central storyline .

Alien (1979)

There are many moving picture fans that callRidley Scott’sAlienthe good revulsion motion picture ever made , but it ’s true punishing to imagine how the sequels change so drastically both in whole step and character . The suspense element of Scott ’s original movie has been completely wiped out and replaced by extensive sci - fi element and action sequence .

It ’s Redditorstanthemanchanthat advise this film as have the most unrecognisable sequels , and they drop a line that " Alienchanged a lot from one film to the next almost to the dot where I ’d hesitate to call it a " franchise " . The only matter that is the same is the xenomorph . "

Mad Max (1979)

Although all the movie have a similar dystopian timbre , there ’s very little that connects all theMad Maxfilms other than their shared protagonist . George Miller ’s films all find like they take post in separate universe , with so much patch happening in between the flick that it ’s sometimes hard to keep up .

The Purge (2013)

Many people are often surprised upon revisit the originalThe Purgethat the cinema only focuses on one family , cave in that the subsequent sequels are much large and focus on on the metropolis - wide conflict that result every year on Purge Night . However , movie buff on Reddit seem to feel that this modification was warrant .

One of these Redditors isambitious_log_1884 , who writes : " I sense likeThe Purge … change for the better . It took on a much bigger scope that reserve for it to explore its potential . The first motion-picture show was basicallyThe Strangerson a heavy scale set in a dystopian future . "

Die Hard (1988)

There ’s no denying that John McClane is one of themost iconic ' fourscore action heroes ever write , but the conflict in his character between the originalDie Hardand its subsequent sequels is shameful . Whilst the original film is more of a survival thriller with plenty of action , the residuum of the franchise is much higher - stakes and less relatable .

Redditor1stchairholophonorpicks up on this , noting that " John McClain is just this normal guy , you roll in the hay ? He ’s just a normal New York City bull who make his base cut , he gets quiver up . But he ’s an everyday guy . In Die firmly 4 , he is jumping a motorcycle into a helicopter in the melodic phrase . You know ? He ’s invincible . "

Rocky (1976)

There ’s a ground thatRockyis considered one of thebest sports movies ever made , but this high kudos does n’t always expect over to the sequels . Whilst the archetype is an sexual account of dream , doggedness and success , the sequel rivet more powerfully on Rocky ’s calling and develop a very unlike whole tone .

Redditormoviebuff90agrees with this opinion , write that " The firstRockyis a realistic , down - to - earth story of a boxer getting his shooting at the big leagues . By the 4th one , the franchise had become a silly , over - the - top , commercialized series where said boxer fight a new villain in every installment . "

Star Wars (1977)

Although it ’s become one of the most democratic franchises of all time today , there was a decimal point in clock time whenStar Warswas just a single film about the conflict between good and evil political forces in space - totally unrestrained by the thousands of pages of ground reading that be within the franchise today .

Some Redditors trust that the extensive attempts to expand theStar Warsuniverse have actually diminished the quality of the original . Redditorghastly_mcnastyargues that " Star Warswas think as an art film . Then everyone took it a little too straight and a little too gravely . Now wait where we are . "

Mission: Impossible (1996)

It ’s difficult to trust now , but the originalMission : Impossiblewas in reality a reasonably small - stakes mission when people regard how acute and dramatic the late episode have been . The original focused much more on the character and the intricacies of the plot than the activeness and spectacle , which hardly happens now .

AlthoughFalloutis popularly cited as one ofTom Cruise ’s best films , it ’s undeniable that the series has change a lot . Reddit userfrightened_by_barkwrites : " TheMission Impossiblemovies now are entirely different from the espionage thriller De Palma made , where the big set piece was a near silent computer hack . "

Saw (2004)

TheSawfranchise has developed a pretty negative reputation over the days , and whilst it ’s mostly justify , it ’s still a shame to see the bequest of such a momentous and imaginative bit of horror ruined by a batch of subpar sequels .

Most audiences seem to agree with this opinion , such as Redditorholdfast02 , who write that " sawing machine 1 was great - the winding at the end I did not see coming . But after that , it seems they were just after more and more gore and shock . Not playfulness to watch over . "

The Fast And The Furious (2001)

Upon watching a gang of minor - time criminals draw off a minor robbery in 2001’sThe Fast and the Furious , nobody could have expected that the very same characters would be engaging in high - stakes battles and outside espionage merely a few year afterwards .

Reddit userausernameisfinetooagrees that the photographic film have interchange drastically since their original installment , state that " characters were real(ish ) and relatable … now they ’re indestructible super soldier until the plot does / doesn’t need them to be . " On top of this , the selling point has always been about the race railcar driving aspect that made the early installments distinctive from other enfranchisement , but these conniption have become less realistic as each film take up on bolder adventures .

NEXT:10 Best Movie Entrances By A Character , According To Reddit

A collage image of Luke Skywalker in A New Hope

Chronicle Ending Explained - How Andrew Is Stopped In The Superhero Movie

Josh Hartnett looking shocked in Fight or Flight

Split image of Jurassic Park and the Fast and Furious movies

Sam Neill in Jurassic Park

Ripley wears a spacesuit in Alien

Article image

Ethan Hawke looking through his door in The Purge

Bruce Willis in a vent in Die Hard

Sylvester Stallone as Rocky

Article image

Breaking fish tank scene in Mission Impossible with Tom Cruise jumping

Saw 2004 Lawrence Gordon

MIa flirts with Brian in The Fast And The Furious (2001)