Related
The on-going success ofThe Lord of the Rings : The Rings of Poweron Prime Video has demonstrated that there is still a heavy deal of pursuit in seeing the human race of Tolkien brought to life sentence on the screen . Of naturally , Peter Jackson’sLord of the Ringstrilogy still casts a very long shadow , and its lineament are still quite beloved .
Aragorn , in finicky , has engendered quite a devoted fandom as the brave ranger who also was the true king of Arnor and Gondor . While many still roll in the hay him , peculiarly as portray by Viggo Mortensen , many Redditors are very candid about their unpopular opinions about the character , such as his romance with Arwen and inaccurate characterization between the motion-picture show and books .
Aragorn Became A Less Intimate Character In Each Film
The Lord of the Ringsfilms are often seen as among thebest fantasy movies ever made , but some Reddit users find out flaws with how the characters were depict . No - Dependent1936 , for example , argue that they lose intimacy or become less focused as they go along , and they especially aim at “ Aragorn pop the messenger . ”
While his cleanup of the Mouth of Sauron is jarring , it get gumption in the context of the mo . This is the instant when Aragorn decides that he has had enough of the twit from Sauron and his envoy . When it comes the right way down to it , Aragorn is no one ’s fool .
Viggo Mortensen Is Too Short For Aragorn
Though Aragorn might be one of thebravest members of the Fellowship , there are still some who ca n’t quite get past his cast . Greengothhas this to say about Mortensen ’s screenland presence : “ Viggo Mortensen was too myopic for Aragorn . get it on how he played him , but moving-picture show Aragorn barely clearing 6 ' when Good Book Aragorn was distinguish as something like 6'6 " has always annoy the hell out of me probably more than it should . ”
While it is true that Aragorn was of the ancient rake of the Numenoreans , this criticism overlooks the many other things that Mortensen brings to the role . In particular , it look across the heat and generousness that the books make a period of demonstrating were fundamental elements of his personality as both a man and a king .
The Movie Version Of The Character Is Better Than The Books
Given thatThe Lord of the Ringsis an adaptation , there are many differences between the movies and the Scripture , peculiarly when it comes to the Fellowship . While some diehard Tolkien fans opt the book version , theunlivedlifedisagrees , writing : “ Unpopular opinion but I really prefer the case of Aragorn in the movies than in the books . ”
The verity is that the two are in reality dissimilar enough that it is potential , and indeed even preferable , to look at them separately . Each loop of the eccentric does something different and offer a separate glossary on the vision that Tolkien himself create .
Viggo Is Too Soft For The Role
Though Aragorn is one of thebest characters in the pic , he has excite a great mint of commentary among Redditors . Much of the conversation sum around Viggo Mortensen and whether he was the ripe individual to play this titanic hoagy . HeWhoCntrolstheSpice , for example , had this to say : “ I found him to be a morsel too … soft … for the role . I always conceived of Aragorn as being rather restrain and forbidding , and I do n’t reckon Viggo quite hit the right promissory note . ”
While the book Aragorn could at times be knockout and indeed very intimidating , he also repeatedly showed that there was another side of him , the side that took four drop off hobbit under his wing and protect them . It ’s to Mortensen ’s credit that he make up one’s mind to bring out this side of the grapheme .
Some Don’t Like The Aragorn/Eowyn Romance
There are many significant relationships inThe Lord of the Rings . Arguably one of the most life-sustaining is that between Eowyn and Aragorn , on the button because it record the richness and depth of their character . However , it was n’t to everyone ’s like , particularly on Reddit .
Sleigers1has this to say : “ The movies seem to inflate it up into a full blown sexual love pursuit , strictly to create some manufactured romantic stress . large deviation . I ’ve never cared for it . ” While it is true that the movies raise this element of the story , it actually act dramatically , as it show just how much each of them has to give up as a result of their war against Sauron .
His Actions At Helm’s Deep Don’t Always Make Sense
There are manyimportant battle inThe Lord of the Rings . Helm ’s Deep is one of the most significant of these , and it features some very heavy action from Aragorn himself . While he shew himself to be one of the Cuban sandwich of the battle , some of his natural process , according to Redditors , do n’t always make sensation .
ForrestGump90particularly criticizes : “ Aragorn differentiate the Galadhrim Archers to charge after firing only one volley of arrows , even though it was wreak in nurse the Uruk Hai army back , purportedly to save Gimli , but he could ’ve done that without wasting his Sagittarius and the eminent land they had ) . ” While the argument is rational , the accuracy is that in the topsy-turvyness of battle it is often difficult , even for someone like Aragorn , to see how everything is going to form out , and he has to make the best decisions he can in the moment .
Jackson Improved On The Arwen/Aragorn Love Story
Arguably the most important love affair inThe Lord of the Ringsis that between Aragorn and Arwen . While it is very much a part of Tolkien ’s book , it could be argued that Jackson improved it . AsTester33333explains : “ Jackson also gave Aragorn some reasons to esteem Arwen beyond her feel , like how she courageously defend Frodo from the Nazgul . ”
As is often the showcase , however , it is more helpful to view the books and the moving picture as freestanding entities . Each brings their own strengths , and while Jackson ’s version is different from Tolkien ’s , it ’s going too far to say that it is definitively better .
Aragorn Killing The Mouth Of Sauron Is A War Crime
Though the Extended Editions make many improvements on the theatrical version , some of these reflect rather poorly on Aragorn . This is peculiarly true of the moment when he vote out the Mouth of Sauron . Willpower2000puts it : “ War - criminal offense Aragorn ! ? That panorama deserves to incinerate . ”
While at first glance it does seem out of part for Aragorn to do this , the truth is that it is a terminal indication of how much he has accepted his fate . What ’s more , it ’s on the dot the type of aggressive action mechanism that is designed to take out and keep Sauron ’s attention , allowing Frodo and Sam to make their path to Mount Doom .
The Movies Damage His Character
For many people , Aragorn is one of the best characters in the movie . However , this is n’t an opinion shared by everyone on Reddit . Haugsporiis particularly critical , writing : “ He goes from a " hesitant ranger " to " accepting his fate " in mere minutes , all because of a blade and a uncanny plotline that Arwen ’s fate is bound to the Ring - and they did n’t even care about explaining this essential plotpoint that turned a case around 180 degrees . ”
It is lawful that this is a shift from Tolkien ’s emphasis . At the same time , it works dramatically and narratively in that it helps to give Aragorn a stronger and more apprehensible motivation than he has in the rule book .
Aragorn In The Books Wouldn’t Have Worked Well On Film
Tolkien excelled at creating active and compelling characters . In this display case of Aragorn , he is a larger - than - life individual , someone who almost seems to have come from a upstage here and now in in-between - earth ’s past .
OK_Historian_1066agrees and goes on to say : “ I do n’t recollect book Aragorn , who is utterly awful , works well on cinema . I reckon PJ know that and change him so the character could have a account arc . I call up that knead great . I do match , however , that it was not consistent with Tolkien ’s work / message . ” While it is genuine that the two conceptions of the character are very different , it would in fact have been possible to translate Tolkien more directly to the screen . The results would have been very discrete , however .
NEXT:10 Cliched Fantasy Movies That Are Still Awesome
